Home Page
Main Message Board | Treatment Discussions | Polls | MC FAQs | Current Research | Information Sites | Medication Info | Diet Info | Jokes | Photo Gallery
  Username:    Password:      Remember me       
MICROSCOPIC COLITIS SUPPORT Forum Index MICROSCOPIC COLITIS SUPPORT
Discussion and Support Forum for Collagenous Colitis, Lymphocytic Colitis, Microscopic Colitis, Mastocytic Enterocolitis, and Related Issues
 
 FAQFAQ  RulesRules   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  ChatChat  Phoogle MapPhoogle Map   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
BlogsBlogs   
 World Time Clock--Time ZonesSally's Photo GalleryLocal WeatherPotty People T-ShirtsPrivacy Policy   
Google
SearchSearch The Archives of This Discussion Board
Calcium supplements raise heart attack risk?!?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic       MICROSCOPIC COLITIS SUPPORT Forum Index -> Main Message Board
 View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Zizzle
Adélie Penguin
Adélie Penguin


Zodiac: Taurus
Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 56
User's local time:
2010 Sep 08 - 4:41 AM


Food Intolerances : gluten, lactose, dairy, yeast, soy

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:24 am    Post subject: Calcium supplements raise heart attack risk?!? Reply with quote

"(Reuters) - Calcium supplements, which many people consume hoping to ward off osteoporosis, may increase the risk of heart attack by as much as 30 percent, researchers reported Friday"
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE66S6GU20100729

It seems the spike in unnatural calcium levels taken as supplements (versus food) has the abilty to form clots and harden arteries. I once read the tablets can go through undigested (especially for us with D), so I take capsules.

I've been taking more calcium citrate plus magnesium and D since I went GF/DF. I just don't know how else to get adequate calcium. I drink fortified milk substitutes, but isn't that equivalent to taking supplements? Or is the dose the important part? If my calcium pills provide 33% RDA with two pills, should I take only one at a time and spread them out over the day?

What do you all do to get adequate calcium and magnesium?
_________________
"IBS" 1998
Lactose Intolerance 2002
MC 2009
HLADQ2
Gluten free since June 2010!



Back to top
starfire
Moderator
Moderator


Zodiac: Aquarius
Joined: 25 May 2005

Posts: 4264
User's local time:
2010 Sep 08 - 4:41 AM


Food Intolerances : Gluten, Soy
Location: Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 10:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I take calcium supplements also, but not too large a dose. Can't remember exactly what it is but I think it's 600. Calcium/Magnesium Citrate + Vit. D.

Seems like anything you do to fix one problem messes with something else.

Love, Shirley
_________________
“The world is not run by those who are ‘right’ but by those who can convince others they are ‘right.’” - Jamshid Gharajedaghi



Back to top
JLH
King Penguin
King Penguin



Joined: 17 Jun 2008

Posts: 2662
User's local time:
2010 Sep 08 - 3:41 AM


Food Intolerances : gluten, casein, soy

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, boy. Sad I take calcium pills (Freeda Vitamins) and use spray magnesium oil.
_________________
DISCLAIMER: I am not a doctor and don't play one on TV.

Joan



Back to top
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin


Zodiac: Gemini
Joined: 24 May 2005

Posts: 12168
User's local time:
2010 Sep 08 - 4:41 AM


Food Intolerances : Gluten and avenin, (avenin is the prolamin in oats, which is equivalent to the gluten in wheat)
Location: Central Texas

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 1:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You have to recognize that everything, (and I mean everything), that we ingest, and everything we do, of a physical nature, affects our health, which means that it also affects the rest of our lives. Everything affects everything else, in one way or another. Looking at this from an engineer's perspective, every input parameter affects the outcome of the process. Some effects are significant, while some are so small as to be negligible, but every input has an effect on virtually every component in the system, either directly or indirectly.

Not only that, but every input provides some benefits, while also causing some harm. Nothing is perfect - nothing is entirely benevolent, and nothing is entirely detrimental - even toxins have some benefits, (if you consider Botox to be beneficial). Everything is a tradeoff - in order to improve one thing, something else must get "hurt". There are no free lunches.

For example, at the insistence of a small army of doctors, I'm taking a statin, a serious blood thinner, (Plavix), a beta-blocker, and an ACE-inhibitor, in order to reduce my presumed stroke risk. However, by doing so, I am well aware that I am significantly increasing my overall risk of mortality by other causes, including cancer, and infections, (mostly because of the statin drastically lowering my cholesterol level). If all goes according to plan, the doctors will be happy, because a stroke will be averted. I may not be so happy, though, because the alternatives don't seem particularly appealing, and the odds of them becoming reality, are increased, by following this treatment plan.

It's a tradeoff, not unlike the proverbial "making a deal with the devil". I'm trading short-term benefits, for long-term risks. You do something similar, when you take a supplement, such as calcium.

Tex
_________________
cowboy

Remember: Status and honoraria go to those who support the current guidelines.



Back to top
Rosie
Gentoo Penguin
Gentoo Penguin
United States

Zodiac: Libra
Joined: 22 Jun 2009

Posts: 426
User's local time:
2010 Sep 08 - 1:41 AM


Food Intolerances : gluten, dairy,soy
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good points, Tex. It seems like every nutrient has its "15 minutes of fame", where it's touted for some sort of "miraculous" benefit, and then its downside gets publicized. There are always tradeoffs...........

The entire scientific article is available for free http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/341/jul29_1/c3691

I took a quick look and was struck by this comment in the article:

Quote:
We excluded trials concerning calcium and vitamin D given together with a placebo comparator (trials were only eligible if vitamin D was given to both intervention and control groups, because vitamin D supplementation has been associated with decreased mortality17

and
Quote:
The results therefore may not apply to coadministered calcium and vitamin D supplements.


So if we take calcium plus Vit D, the results may not apply to us! If anything, this paper may point out the importance of Vit. D.

Also, it appears prudent to take supplemental calcium in small doses spread out through the day, rather than one or two big doses.

Rosie
_________________
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time………Thomas Edison



Back to top
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin


Zodiac: Gemini
Joined: 24 May 2005

Posts: 12168
User's local time:
2010 Sep 08 - 4:41 AM


Food Intolerances : Gluten and avenin, (avenin is the prolamin in oats, which is equivalent to the gluten in wheat)
Location: Central Texas

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 8:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rosie,

Thanks for locating the BMJ article. I think we can all breathe a sigh of relief about this particular "risk", because the BMJ article also includes this statement:

Quote:
Conclusions Calcium supplements (without coadministered vitamin D) are associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction.


Now that statement, I can believe. The journalists who are interpreting this stuff for the public, obviously don't know what they're doing, or they intentionally leave out some of the important information, in order to make the news more sensational. I don't see vitamin D mentioned anywhere in the Reuters article. sigh

Tex
_________________
cowboy

Remember: Status and honoraria go to those who support the current guidelines.



Back to top
Rosie
Gentoo Penguin
Gentoo Penguin
United States

Zodiac: Libra
Joined: 22 Jun 2009

Posts: 426
User's local time:
2010 Sep 08 - 1:41 AM


Food Intolerances : gluten, dairy,soy
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tex, there are some interesting responses to the article from other scientists making some of your same points! http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/341/jul29_1/c3691

What caught my eye was that several of these responses mentioned the importance of Vit K2 for bone health and calcium uptake into bone. IBDs were specifically mentioned as being associated with Vit K deficiency. I haven't seen the issue of Vit K2 discussed here, but a quick google search shows that it might be a helpful supplement to those of us struggling with osteoporosis because of our general malabsorption issues. Most of the Vit K2 is made by bacteria in the intestine which converts Vit K1 from our diet to K2. And the main sources of Vit K1 are green leafy vegetables and the Brassicas, like cabbage, broccoli, etc........which of course are off most of our lists. And some Vit K2 is available in chicken and egg yolk. Also, Vit K is a fat-soluble vitamin, and many of us have issues with fat malabsorbtion. And because of our IBD, perhaps we don't have as much bacterial conversion of the Vit K1 to K2. Supplements are available, but I'm sure it gets complicated, because Vit K2 also has a prominent role in the blood clotting cascade. For example, people on the blood thinner coumadin can't take Vit K2, as it inactivates the coumadin. I have Factor V Leiden, which predisposes me to blood clots, so I would want to do more investigation on that issue.

And unfortunately there here isn't a commercial test available yet for Vit K2 blood levels, so you can't find out if you are deficient. But I'm going to do some more research, as Vit K2 may be important in improving my bone density.

Rosie
_________________
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time………Thomas Edison



Back to top
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin


Zodiac: Gemini
Joined: 24 May 2005

Posts: 12168
User's local time:
2010 Sep 08 - 4:41 AM


Food Intolerances : Gluten and avenin, (avenin is the prolamin in oats, which is equivalent to the gluten in wheat)
Location: Central Texas

PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 3:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rosie,

Maybe K2 will turn out to be the next "ignored" vitamin, and it will follow in the footsteps of vitamin D.

Tex
_________________
cowboy

Remember: Status and honoraria go to those who support the current guidelines.



Back to top
Gabes-Apg
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin


Zodiac: Scorpio
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 1081
User's local time:
2010 Sep 08 - 7:41 PM


Food Intolerances : Confirmed - Gluten, Yeast, Caesin, Soy, salad/raw veges and fruit Avoiding brocoli, beans, peas
Location: Brisbane - Australia

PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 2:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i didnt read the article - but wondered - was there any mention about patients self administrating their dosage of calcium and if they were doing cal mag in the right proportions?

and maybe a link to this issue is that people are not having regular tests( blood, bone density etc) and not getting guidence as to the dosage they should be having? including testing and guidence with Vit D levels.


Tex
Quote:
Now that statement, I can believe. The journalists who are interpreting this stuff for the public, obviously don't know what they're doing, or they intentionally leave out some of the important information, in order to make the news more sensational. I don't see vitamin D mentioned anywhere in the Reuters article


Agree totally - cant let the facts get in the way of a good story.


i went to my GP on friday, it was another new one (my 3rd in 2 years) she was quite good, she obviously had not had a chance to read my history so i gave her the 30 words or less summary, and asked for the referral for blood tests for B levels and Vit D and we discussed a few other things that we should check, I agreed with all her suggestions, i will go and have a bone density test as well and then we will discuss calcium/vit D and other nutrients etc once we have a 'comprehensive' story on what is happening
i was happy that she was not going to rely on just blood tests and of course that she was not questioning my MC management (ie Diet) she agreed that i must be doing ok if i had not have major flares or had other illnesses like colds and flus with our winter season and my work travels.
_________________
Gabes Ryan

i like nonsense, it wakes up the braincells...dr seuss



Back to top
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin


Zodiac: Gemini
Joined: 24 May 2005

Posts: 12168
User's local time:
2010 Sep 08 - 4:41 AM


Food Intolerances : Gluten and avenin, (avenin is the prolamin in oats, which is equivalent to the gluten in wheat)
Location: Central Texas

PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 9:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gabes,

Congratulations on finding another "MC-friendly" doctor. thumbs up

Tex
_________________
cowboy

Remember: Status and honoraria go to those who support the current guidelines.



Back to top
Gabes-Apg
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin


Zodiac: Scorpio
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 1081
User's local time:
2010 Sep 08 - 7:41 PM


Food Intolerances : Confirmed - Gluten, Yeast, Caesin, Soy, salad/raw veges and fruit Avoiding brocoli, beans, peas
Location: Brisbane - Australia

PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 1:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tex

I think more so they see that i am confident, in control and have quite defined ideas re my MC, and dont try to challenge me.
_________________
Gabes Ryan

i like nonsense, it wakes up the braincells...dr seuss



Back to top
Zizzle
Adélie Penguin
Adélie Penguin


Zodiac: Taurus
Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 56
User's local time:
2010 Sep 08 - 4:41 AM


Food Intolerances : gluten, lactose, dairy, yeast, soy

PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 2:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tex wrote:

Maybe K2 will turn out to be the next "ignored" vitamin, and it will follow in the footsteps of vitamin D.
Tex


Dr. Mercola has been trying to sound the Vitamin K alarm for a few years. I've read at least 2 articles about it in the last couple of months. He ties it to diabetes, heart disease, bone density, cancer, and vericose veins.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/arch...iabetes-risk.aspx
_________________
"IBS" 1998
Lactose Intolerance 2002
MC 2009
HLADQ2
Gluten free since June 2010!



Back to top
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin


Zodiac: Gemini
Joined: 24 May 2005

Posts: 12168
User's local time:
2010 Sep 08 - 4:41 AM


Food Intolerances : Gluten and avenin, (avenin is the prolamin in oats, which is equivalent to the gluten in wheat)
Location: Central Texas

PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 5:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for that link. You know, looking back a couple of generations or so, (IOW, looking at how our grandparents and great-grandparents lived, 50 to 100 years ago), and comparing their diets and lifestyles with ours, today, it's no wonder that cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, and all manner of ailments, (especially allergies and food intolerances), are increasing, (despite all the billions of dollars thrown at medical care and research, over the decades). Back in those days, our grandparents got all their vitamins and minerals from their diet, by eating real food, (except for vitamin D, which they also derived from exposure to the sun). These days, the government, food manufacturers, and the medical community, have convinced us that we should get our vitamins and minerals from food additives, (in the form of "enriched" foods), and we avoid the sun by slathering on sunscreen, and hanging out in air-conditioned buildings. One of the biggest trends in food fads, today, is enriched "junk food" - stuff that we shouldn't be eating in the first place, but since it's "enriched", it's claimed to be healthy and nutritious. Rolling Eyes

Even the government and the medical community are convinced that eating a nutrient-based diet is the way to go. A few generations ago, people would have laughed at that idea - why worry about nutrients, when whole, healthy foods, contained everything they needed for good health and energy? Today, we pasteurize milk, irradiate foods, and soak them with preservatives. Since all the processing destroys a lot of the nutrition that the food originally contained, all sorts of additives are used, to try to not only restore the original nutrition level, but enhance it, (to make it better, doncha know). Our grandparents raised most of their own food, and didn't process it to death, so additives weren't needed. I'm sure their diets weren't perfect, by any means, but I have a hunch that for the most part, they did a much better job of getting the vital vitamins and minerals that they needed, and by eating only local foods, the risks of accidentally being exposed to most of the pathogens that make the national headlines today, were extremely low.

Here's the greatest problem with the current nutrient-based system - by pretending that we are smart enough to "know" which nutrients are important, and emphasizing them, we run the obvious risk of "outsmarting" ourselves, and accidentally overlooking a few vital elements that significantly change the logistics of long-term health, over the generations. It's even conceivable that some of the damage may be irreversible, and the health of not just individuals, but of our entire species may be damaged forever, because of certain long-term dietary indiscretions. The current vitamin D "crisis", (and presumably K2), is a good example of the risks of our current system.

We often think of the paleo people as smaller in stature than modern humans, with a short life expectancy, but in reality, on the average, they were just as tall, or taller, and obviously much stronger than we are, (and the neanderthals were even larger and stronger). True, many of them didn't live long, because of environmental hazards, (most predators could outrun humans, and hospitals hadn't been invented, yet, to treat health issues that did arise), but baring unforeseen "accidents", life expectancy was actually quite long. After a million years or so of evolution, we've improved our standard of living immensely, but our health in general, seems to have declined significantly. Sad

Tex
_________________
cowboy

Remember: Status and honoraria go to those who support the current guidelines.



Back to top
joefnh
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin


Zodiac: Libra
Joined: 23 Apr 2010
Posts: 581
User's local time:
2010 Sep 08 - 4:41 AM


Food Intolerances : Gluten, Soy, Onions, Dairy Products (all), Brussel Sprouts
Location: Manchester, NH

PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 5:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tex the very term "enriched junk food" is such an obvious contradiction. Actually the very thought makes me sick...

Going back to my grandparents, one of their favorite gripes was all of adulterated foods .. Of course being young and "informed & modern" we ignored their concerns and wisdom. Now of course its the whole foods and simple foods that are helping our diseased bodies... go figure

--Joe
_________________
"Your vision will become clear only when you look into your heart ... Who looks outside, dreams. Who looks inside, awakens." - Carl Jung



Back to top
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin


Zodiac: Gemini
Joined: 24 May 2005

Posts: 12168
User's local time:
2010 Sep 08 - 4:41 AM


Food Intolerances : Gluten and avenin, (avenin is the prolamin in oats, which is equivalent to the gluten in wheat)
Location: Central Texas

PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 5:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joe,

LOL. I think the industry prefers to call it "snack food", and things of that sort - "junk food" was just my choice of terms. Laughing

Tex
_________________
cowboy

Remember: Status and honoraria go to those who support the current guidelines.



Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic      Reply to topic    MICROSCOPIC COLITIS SUPPORT Forum Index -> Main Message Board All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Remove cookies set by this forum

Search online dictionaries
(Powered by OneLook® Dictionary Search)

Enter word or phrase:
Enter a word to search for dictionary web sites that include that word.
Enter a pattern consisting of letters and wildcards to search for words.
Valid wildcards are * (matches multiple letters) and ? (matches one letter).


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
IP Country Flag 2.9.6b © 2005, 2008 - 3Di (aka 3D)

Copyright © 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 perskyfarms.com, All Rights Reserved

Copyright Notice: The material on this site is copyrighted by perskyfarms.com, and it is protected from unauthorized copying and dissemination by United States copyright law, trademark law, international conventions, and other intellectual property laws. This copyright protection also extends to any and all images, found on any and all pages of this site.

Please contact us at this address for permission, if you wish to use any material on this website for any commercial or public purpose.

We have made a good faith effort not to violate any copyright. If we have unknowingly done so, please contact the site administrator, at this address, and the issue will be promptly corrected.

Disclaimer: The information contained within this site is intended solely for general educational purposes, and is not intended, nor implied, to be a substitute for professional medical advice relative to your specific medical condition or question. Anyone who chooses to use any information found here, does so at his or her own risk. Always seek the advice of your physician or other health care provider for any questions you may have regarding your medical condition. Only your physician can provide specific diagnoses and therapies. By using this site you agree to the following terms and conditions:

Certain members of this discussion board are practicing medical professionals. They are not here to offer medial advice, they are here because they have been diagnosed with microsopic colitis, and they are interested in sharing their own personal experiences concerning the disease, and learning from others in all walks of life, who also have to deal with these issues. If you have any questions or concerns regarding your health, you should consult with your own doctor, or medial professional.

If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor, or 911, immediately. The members of this board, regardless of whether or not they are medical professionals, cannot respond to issues requiring urgent medical attention. Please note that no legal action can be taken by any user of this site, as a result of any information found here, and that none of the parties involved, neither individually, nor collectively, nor the owner of this site, can be held responsible for any information offered in the course of discussions, regardless of circumstances, whether those discussions are in a public or private form, and regardless of whether of not any of the parties involved are professionals. Remember that this discussion board is not intended to be a replacement for a consultation with your doctor or other medical professonal, it is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and personal experience of the members of this discussion board.

This site does not recommend or endorse any specific tests, products, procedures, opinions, or other information that may be mentioned anywhere on this site. Reliance on any information provided here is solely at your own risk.

Main Message Board | Treatment Discussions | Polls | MC FAQs | Current Research | Information Sites | Medication Info | Diet Info | Jokes | Photo Gallery