Go to Home Page
Main Message Board | Treatment Discussions | Polls | MC FAQs | Recipes | Information Sites | Medication Info | Diet Info | Jokes | Photo Gallery
  Username:    Password:      Remember me       

You can get your life back
Discussion and Support Forum for Collagenous Colitis, Lymphocytic Colitis, Microscopic Colitis, Mastocytic Enterocolitis, and Related Issues

MICROSCOPIC COLITIS SUPPORT Forum IndexVisit the Microscopic Colitis Foundation Website

The only comprehensive book ever written about Microscopic Colitis
Can be ordered at any bookstore or library
 FAQFAQ  RulesRules   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  ChatChat   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 World Time Clock--Time ZonesPotty People T-ShirtsPrivacy Policy
SearchSearch The Archives of This Discussion Board
Well the mystery continues, got my IgA Scores

Post new topic   Reply to topic       MICROSCOPIC COLITIS SUPPORT Forum Index -> Discussions About Enterolab Testing
 View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Adélie Penguin
Adélie Penguin
United States

Joined: 14 Sep 2010

Posts: 167
User's local time:
2018 Jan 19 - 11:58 PM

Location: Ohio

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:21 pm    Post subject: Well the mystery continues, got my IgA Scores Reply with quote

My IgA, and IgG came back normal

IgA Result 187 Ref Range 68-378
IgG Result 803 Ref Range 768-1632

This means that my low test scores with enterolab were correct. But I still can't figure out why I react to gluten even though enterolab says I do not show an intolerance to it. And why I do not react to casein and yeast even though the enterolab says I should. Strange.

Always a mystery
Back to top
Emperor Penguin
Emperor Penguin

Joined: 21 Dec 2009

Posts: 7340
User's local time:
2018 Jan 20 - 2:58 PM

Food Intolerances : Gluten, Yeast, Caesin, Soy, salad/raw veges and fruit
Location: Hunter Valley NSW Australia

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know you are seeking the 'concrete' answers to what is going on, my advice is, listen to your body, it will tell you what works for you and what doesnt.

it has been discussed previously on this site that some of the ranges for tests and how they are conducted are not a true true indication of what is going, it is only one element.

I havent dont enterlab testing i have figured out what ingredients work and dont work via elimination diet, it takes time and patience but it works......

other health issues play their part, meds we are taking for other conditions play their part, it is all very individual.

take care
Gabes Ryan

"Anything that contradicts experience and logic should be abandoned"
Dalai Lama
Back to top
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin

Joined: 28 Jun 2009

Posts: 1676
User's local time:
2018 Jan 20 - 12:58 PM

Food Intolerances : Gluten, Diary, Soy, Corn, Eggs, Peanuts and other legumes, nightshades (e.g. tomatoes and potatoes). DX Osteopenia. Suspect Celiac - Genes Type: DQ2/DQ8

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You may find the answer to your question in the webinar on this thread.

There are many versions of Gliadin and I am not sure that Enterolab tests for all of them (someone correct me if I am wrong).


best, Ant
Back to top
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin

Joined: 29 May 2009

Posts: 1500
User's local time:
2018 Jan 19 - 10:58 PM

Food Intolerances : gluten, dairy, soy, tapioca
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


I felt the same way at one time. I wanted to know WHY and I chased after a diagnosis for a long time. It is possible that you do have some overactive mast cells. In sensitive individuals, like myself, lectins cause mast cell degranulation and that can lead to D. I suspect that scenario is more common than most realize. There is not test to measure that, not even secretory IgA. The bottom line is that a GF diet was effective. I gave up trying to get answers and shifted my focus to what works. I realized there were many unanswered questions where gluten was concerned and in the long run it didn't matter much. Despite what any lab test tells you, if you are sensitive to gluten then you should avoid it. The answer may come in time, but the most important thing is focus on what you know works for you.

Take care,

Mary Beth
"If you believe it will work out, you'll see opportunities. If you believe it won't you will see obstacles." - Dr. Wayne Dyer
Back to top

Joined: 25 May 2005

Posts: 5169
User's local time:
2018 Jan 19 - 11:58 PM

Food Intolerances : gluten, dairy, soy, corn, yeast, chocolate, tomato, white potato, celery, sesame, carrot, yellow squash, lamb, pork, mango, strawberry, almond, cashew, vanilla, grapefruit, raspberry, avocado, mustard, paprika, cauliflower, cucumber, plum, and more!
Location: Maryland

PostPosted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi IDream,

Just for the record, I agree with what others have said. The bottom line is to listen to your body, which often involves a lot of trial and error.


Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused.
Back to top
Site Admin
Site Admin

Joined: 24 May 2005

Posts: 31003
User's local time:
2018 Jan 19 - 10:58 PM

Food Intolerances : Gluten, casein, soy, and avenin, (avenin is the prolamin in oats, which is equivalent to the gluten in wheat), beef, grapes, peanuts, cashews, almonds, (but nut butters seem OK except for peanuts), citric acid, chocolate, and agar.
Location: Central Texas

PostPosted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 9:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi IDream,

As we all know, we don't live in a perfect world, and that means that it is impossible to design a perfect test. Like everything else in life, lab tests involve trade offs, and they are limited by the laws of physics and mathematics. One of the vulnerablities for tests based on IgA antibody detection is IgA deficiency, which you just ruled out, in your case. The possibility still exists that you may be sensitive to protein fractions that are not tested for, (since the tests are by necessity, very restrictive). Another possibility, though, is that you are one of the few individuals who happen to get caught by the necessary statistical restrictions imposed by the mathematics involved in determining the cutoff point for a positive test result. Due to the mathematics involved, it's possible that your test result should have been positive, even though it falls below the stated cutoff point. IOW, maybe the cutoff point is too high for your particular case.

It turns out that one of our members has a lot of experience working with tests of this type, and she is very familiar with the statistical analyses involved in making the hard choices necessary for setting the operating parameters for such tests. Rosie brought this to my attention, and I am grateful for her expertise, and her insight into the problem, since it provides us with another possible explanation, and a reason for questioning "suspicious" negative test results.

According to her analysis, statistically, there is only a slim chance of receiving a false positive test result, so for test results above the cutoff point, there is no reason to doubt the result. Due to the way that the statistical analysis works, though, because of the wide range of possible test results, the possibility of false negative results cannot be ignored. Statistically, (percentage-wise), it's not a bad risk, and it mostly applies to scores barely below the cutoff point, but the fact is, a certain percentage of test subjects are going to end up with test results below the cutoff score, even though their test result should be positive. IOW, their test result will be a false negative, meaning that their test result will show a negative response, even though they are sensitive to the antigen being tested for. This risk exists in the vicinity of the cutoff point, and the farther a test result falls, from the cutoff point, the lower the chances of a false result, obviously.

I realize that it's a disturbing thought to suggest that the 10 unit cutoff point might not be 100 % accurate for everyone, but anytime statistical analysis is necessary, in order to determine test parameters, such a risk exists. It's typically unavoidable. This doesn't change the fact that these tests are by far the most accurate means we have, for determining food sensitivities. Enterolab's stool tests will detect gluten-sensitivity several years before celiac disease has progressed to the point where the classic celiac blood tests will yield a positive result, in many/most cases. We just have to remember that for a few people, negative scores just below the cutoff point may be false negative results. For most of us, though, even a score of 9 would be an accurate negative result. This caveat only affects a chosen few, who happen to be victims of the statistical odds. The good news is that positive results, (above the cutoff point), are extremely reliable, and that's the most important part of the entire analysis, because the biggest problem with the blood tests is the fact that they are notorious for false negative results - they miss far too many cases of gluten-sensitivity. The stool tests at Enterolab don't have that problem.

Many thanks to Rosie, for devoting her time and analytical skills to checking this out for us. thumbs up Knowledge is power, and IMO, it's usually even more important to know why things sometimes go wrong, than it is to know why they usually go right. Now we know what corrective action to take, when barely negative results don't seem to be right. Of course, we already knew what to do, didn't we - Dr. Fine told us right off the bat, to adopt the GF diet, anytime a negative result seems suspicious.


It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
Back to top
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin

Joined: 06 Sep 2010

Posts: 764
User's local time:
2018 Jan 19 - 11:58 PM

Food Intolerances : Gluten
Location: Indiana

PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 9:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


I get my results Tuesday and I bet they will be like yours. So I do agree that listening to our bodies is the best option. And frankly for you (and probably me), it is our only option. But I am finding out that it is a good option, nonetheless.

I have always said that I would like my doctors, family, associates, etc. to crawl inside my skin so they can feel my body. It is so hard to describe what MC makes one feel like to those who do not have it.

I have ignored, for years, what my body was screaming to me. But since joining this forum, I am starting to listen. I still don't understand everything my body is telling me, but I am hopeful I will get there.

Will share my results when I get them.

"It's not what I believe. It's what I can prove." - A Few Good Men
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic      Reply to topic    MICROSCOPIC COLITIS SUPPORT Forum Index -> Discussions About Enterolab Testing All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Remove cookies set by this forum

Search online dictionaries
(Powered by OneLook® Dictionary Search)
Enter word or phrase:
Enter a word to search for dictionary web sites that include that word.
Enter a pattern consisting of letters and wildcards to search for words.
Valid wildcards are * (matches multiple letters) and ? (matches one letter).
Locations of visitors to this page

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
IP Country Flag 2.9.6b © 2005, 2008 - 3Di (aka 3D)

Copyright © 2005–2017 perskyfarms.com, All Rights Reserved

Copyright Notice: The material on this site is copyrighted by perskyfarms.com, and it is protected from unauthorized copying and dissemination by United States copyright law, trademark law, international conventions, and other intellectual property laws. This copyright protection also extends to any and all images, found on any and all pages of this site.

Please contact us at this address for permission, if you wish to use any material on this website for any commercial or public purpose.

We have made a good faith effort not to violate any copyright. If we have unknowingly done so, please contact the site administrator, at this address, and the issue will be promptly corrected.

Disclaimer: The information contained within this site is intended solely for general educational purposes, and is not intended, nor implied, to be a substitute for professional medical advice relative to your specific medical condition or question. Anyone who chooses to use any information found here, does so at his or her own risk. Always seek the advice of your physician or other health care provider for any questions you may have regarding your medical condition. Only your physician can provide specific diagnoses and therapies. By using this site you agree to the following terms and conditions:

Certain members of this discussion board are practicing medical professionals. They are not here to offer medial advice, they are here because they have been diagnosed with microsopic colitis, and they are interested in sharing their own personal experiences concerning the disease, and learning from others in all walks of life, who also have to deal with these issues. If you have any questions or concerns regarding your health, you should consult with your own doctor, or medial professional.

If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor, or 911, immediately. The members of this board, regardless of whether or not they are medical professionals, cannot respond to issues requiring urgent medical attention. Please note that no legal action can be taken by any user of this site, as a result of any information found here, and that none of the parties involved, neither individually, nor collectively, nor the owner of this site, can be held responsible for any information offered in the course of discussions, regardless of circumstances, whether those discussions are in a public or private form, and regardless of whether of not any of the parties involved are professionals. Remember that this discussion board is not intended to be a replacement for a consultation with your doctor or other medical professonal, it is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and personal experience of the members of this discussion board.

This site does not recommend or endorse any specific tests, products, procedures, opinions, or other information that may be mentioned anywhere on this site. Reliance on any information provided here is solely at your own risk.

Main Message Board | Treatment Discussions | Polls | MC FAQs | Recipes | Information Sites | Medication Info | Diet Info | Jokes | Photo Gallery